Supply: Life-style Asia Hong Kong
By: Akshat Mittal
In a big growth, the Supreme Court docket of India has granted bail to former Mumbai
Police officer Pradeep Sharma, who was arrested in reference to the Antilia bomb planting
case and the next killing of businessman Mansukh Hiran. The choice got here on
Wednesday, following a bench comprising Justice AS Bopanna and Justice PS Narasimha’s
deliberations. Pradeep Sharma’s bail was challenged after a Bombay Excessive Court docket order denied
him bail within the case.
The Antilia bomb planting case revolves across the discovery of a bomb-laden SUV close to the
residence of industrialist Mukesh Ambani in south Mumbai on February 25, 2021. The SUV was
discovered within the possession of businessman Mansukh Hiran, who tragically misplaced his life on March 5,
2021, beneath suspicious circumstances. The case garnered nationwide consideration on account of its
high-profile nature, with the highlight on the attainable motives behind the planting of the
Sachin Waze, a former Mumbai Police officer who was subsequently dismissed from the drive,
is the prime accused in each the Antilia bomb planting case and the killing of Mansukh Hiran.
The case took a fancy flip with allegations that Pradeep Sharma, one other former colleagueof Waze, had performed a task in aiding Waze in eliminating Hiran. These allegations shaped the
foundation for the denial of bail to Sharma by the Bombay Excessive Court docket.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi represented Pradeep Sharma in his bail plea earlier than the
Supreme Court docket. He argued that there was no direct proof linking Sharma to the principle
accused, Sachin Waze, and emphasised that the bomb-laden SUV had been parked close to
Antilia by Waze, along with Hiran. In accordance with Rohatgi, this act was orchestrated to
convey Waze into the limelight and create an impression that he had thwarted an assault. Sharma
distanced himself from these actions, asserting that he was unconcerned with Waze’s
Alternatively, Further Solicitor Common SV Raju represented the Nationwide Investigation
Company (NIA) and opposed Pradeep Sharma’s bail plea. Raju argued that Sharma was a
co-conspirator within the killing of Mansukh Hiran and had met Waze, however the particulars of their
discussions had been unclear. The query of what transpired between the 2 throughout their assembly
was a central level of competition.
After fastidiously listening to arguments from each side, the bench reserved its order on Monday,
resulting in the awaited verdict on Wednesday. The Supreme Court docket’s choice to grant bail to
Pradeep Sharma raises questions in regards to the power of the proof towards him and his
alleged involvement within the occasions surrounding the Antilia bomb planting case and Mansukh
The case has unfolded towards the backdrop of the intrigue surrounding the safety lapse close to
Mukesh Ambani’s residence and the next demise of Mansukh Hiran. The Antilia bomb
planting incident raised considerations in regards to the security and safety of high-profile people, whereas
Hiran’s mysterious demise intensified hypothesis about potential motives and cover-ups.
The Supreme Court docket’s bail choice marks a pivotal second on this advanced case, prompting
discussions in regards to the nature of proof, the position of varied people, and the bigger
implications for regulation enforcement and justice. The authorized proceedings will proceed as extra particulars
emerge and the case unfolds additional, shedding mild on the circumstances and motivations
behind these high-profile occasions that captured the nation’s consideration.